The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Is getting drunk a sin?

What Christian writers said, from about AD 100 to 1911.

48 passages · 24 writers · 10 centuries

The short answer

The writers hold that getting drunk is a sin because it abuses God's gift of wine, clouds reason and conscience, leads to other sins, and shuts the drunkard out of the kingdom. Aquinas calls drunkenness that is knowingly chosen a mortal sin and says that where a man is ignorant of the wine's strength the drunkenness is not imputed to him as a sin, only the excessive drink, while Augustine says that in a righteous man even one instance of drunkenness must be accounted for. Taylor describes any immoderate use of drink beyond its proper ends as drunkenness, and de Sales says a single act does not stamp a man as a drunkard. Aquinas and Finney say a man who willingly gets drunk answers for what he does in that state, Luther says an offence committed in intoxication is not excusable, Calvin says a drunkard's going astray is in no way excusable, and Aquinas also says the drunkenness diminishes the resulting sin. On habitual drunkenness, South and Spurgeon refuse the excuse that habit makes a man unable to stop, Moody and Spurgeon say God or the Holy Spirit helps a man break the habit, and Wesley says he has known five hundred, perhaps five thousand, habitual drunkards converted to God.

Why drunkenness is a sin and what it does

17 passages · 12 writers · 1st c. to 1900s

Chrysostom warns against using the gift of God immoderately, Whitefield says drunkenness abuses God's good creatures, and Matthew Henry says drunkards ungratefully abuse the bodily strength God gave them. Clement of Alexandria, Taylor, and South say drunkenness harms the mind or understanding, and Jerome and Taylor connect it with lust. Chrysostom and Spurgeon say it shuts a man out of heaven or the kingdom.

c. 197–200 · Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor (Paedagogus) 2.2

You see the danger of shipwreck. The heart is drowned in much drink. The excess of drunkenness is compared to the danger of the sea, in which when the body has once been sunken like a ship, it descends to the depths of turpitude, overwhelmed in the mighty billows of wine; and the helmsman, the human mind, is tossed about on the surge of drunkenness, which swells aloft; and buried in the trough of the sea, is blinded by the darkness of the tempest, having drifted away from the haven of truth, till, dashing on the rocks beneath the sea, it perishes, driven by itself into voluptuous indulgences. With reason, therefore, the apostle enjoins, “Be not drunk with wine, in which there is much excess;” by the term excess (ἀσωτία) intimating the inconsistence of drunkenness with salvation (τὸ ἄσωστον). For if He made water wine at the marriage, He did not give permission to get drunk.

387 · John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Statues to the People of Antioch (De statuis) 1.12

Wine was given to restore the body’s weakness, not to overturn the soul’s strength; to remove the sickness of the flesh, not to destroy the health of the spirit. Do not then, by using the gift of God immoderately, afford a handle to the foolish and the impudent. For what is a more wretched thing than drunkenness! The drunken man is a living corpse. Drunkenness is a demon self-chosen, a disease without excuse, an overthrow that admits of no apology; a common shame to our kind. The drunken man is not only useless in our assemblies; not only in public and private affairs; but the bare sight of him is the most disgusting of all things, his breath being stench. The belchings, and gapings, and speech of the intoxicated, are at once unpleasant and offensive, and are utterly abhorrent to those who see and converse with them; and the crown of these evils is, that this disease makes heaven inaccessible to drunkards, and does not suffer them to win eternal blessedness: for besides the shame attending those who labour under this disease here, a grievous punishment is also awaiting them there!

1650 · Jeremy Taylor, The Rule and Exercises of Holy Living 2.2.5

The evils and sad consequents of drunkenness (the consideration of which are as so many arguments to avoid the sin) are to this sense reckoned by the writers of holy Scripture, and other wise personages of the world. 1. It causeth woes and mischief, wounds and sorrow, sin and shame; it maketh bitterness of spirit, brawling and quarrelling; it increaseth rage and lesseneth strength; it maketh red eyes, and a loose and babbling tongue. 2. It particularly ministers to lust, and yet disables the body; so that in effect it makes man wanton as a satyr, and impotent as age. And Solomon, in enumerating the evils of this vice, adds this to the account, ‘thine eyes shall behold strange women, and thine heart shall utter perverse things: as if the drunkard were only desire, and then impatience, muttering and enjoying like an eunuch embracing a woman. 3. It besots and hinders the actions of the understanding, making a man brutish in his passions, and a fool in his reason; and differs nothing from madness but that it is voluntary, and so is an equal evil in nature, and a worse in manners. 4. It takes off all the guards, and lets loose the reins of all those evils to which a man is by his nature or by his evil customs inclined, and from which he is restrained by reason and severe principles. Drunkenness calls off the watchmen from their towers; and then all the evils that can proceed from a loose heart and an untied tongue, and a dissolute spirit, and an unguarded unlimited will, all that we may put upon the accounts of drunkenness. 5. It extinguisheth and quenches the Spirit of God and with wine at the same time.

How grave it is and what counts as drunk

10 passages · 8 writers · 300s to 1800s

Aquinas calls drunkenness a mortal sin when it is knowingly chosen, and says that ignorance of the wine's strength means the drunkenness is not imputed as a sin. Taylor describes every going off from one's usual temper as a degree of drunkenness, and Finney says intemperance consists in the inward disposition and not the outward act. Augustine and de Sales distinguish a single act from a habit: Augustine says a man may be drunk on one occasion without being a drunkard, and de Sales says a single act does not stamp a man for ever.

c. 397–400 · Augustine of Hippo, Reply to Faustus the Manichaean (Contra Faustum) 22.44

We are told that they made him drunk, so that he was unaware of what happened. His guilt therefore is not that of incest, but of drunkenness. This, too, is condemned by the eternal law, which allows meat and drink only as required by nature for the preservation of health. There is, indeed, a great difference between a drunk man and an habitual drunkard; for the drunkard is not always drunk, and a man may be drunk on one occasion without being a drunkard. However, in the case of a righteous man, we require to account for even one instance of drunkenness.

1265–1273 · Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II, q. 150, a. 2, co.

Thirdly, it may happen that a man is well aware that the drink is immoderate and intoxicating, and yet he would rather be drunk than abstain from drink. Such a man is a drunkard properly speaking, because morals take their species not from things that occur accidentally and beside the intention, but from that which is directly intended. In this way drunkenness is a mortal sin, because then a man willingly and knowingly deprives himself of the use of reason, whereby he performs virtuous deeds and avoids sin, and thus he sins mortally by running the risk of falling into sin. For Ambrose says (De Patriarch. [*De Abraham i.]): "We learn that we should shun drunkenness, which prevents us from avoiding grievous sins. For the things we avoid when sober, we unknowingly commit through drunkenness." Therefore drunkenness, properly speaking, is a mortal sin.

1650 · Jeremy Taylor, The Rule and Exercises of Holy Living 2.2.4

Drunkenness is an immoderate affection and use of drink. That I call immoderate that is beside or beyond that order of good things for which God hath given us the use of drink. The ends are digestion of our meat, cheerfulness and refreshment of our spirits, or any end of health; beside which if we go, or at any time beyond it, it is inordinate and criminal — it is the vice of drunkenness. It is forbidden by our blessed Saviour in these words: “Take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness:” surfeiting, that is, the evil effects, the sottishness and remaining stupidity of habitual, or of the last night’s drunkenness. For Christ forbids both the actual and the habitual intemperance; not only the effect of it, but also the affection to it; for in both there is sin. He that drinks but little, if that little makes him drunk, and if he knew beforehand his own infirmity, is guilty of surfeiting, not of drunkenness.

Whether drunkenness excuses sins done while drunk

6 passages · 6 writers · 700s to 1800s

Aquinas, John of Damascus, and Finney say that a man who willingly gets drunk answers for what he does in that state, Luther says an offence committed in intoxication is not excusable, and Calvin says a drunkard's going astray is in no way excusable. Aquinas also says drunkenness diminishes the resulting sin.

1265–1273 · Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II, q. 150, a. 4, s.c.

On the contrary, According to Augustine (Contra Faust. xxii, 43), Lot was to be excused from incest on account of drunkenness. I answer that, Two things are to be observed in drunkenness, as stated above (A[1]), namely the resulting defect and the preceding act. on the part of the resulting defect whereby the use of reason is fettered, drunkenness may be an excuse for sin, in so far as it causes an act to be involuntary through ignorance. But on the part of the preceding act, a distinction would seem necessary; because, if the drunkenness that results from that act be without sin, the subsequent sin is entirely excused from fault, as perhaps in the case of Lot. If, however, the preceding act was sinful, the person is not altogether excused from the subsequent sin, because the latter is rendered voluntary through the voluntariness of the preceding act, inasmuch as it was through doing something unlawful that he fell into the subsequent sin. Nevertheless, the resulting sin is diminished, even as the character of voluntariness is diminished.

1566 · Martin Luther, Table Talk 28

I have cracked many hollow nuts, and yet I thought they had been good, but they fouled my mouth, and filled it with dust; Carlstad and Erasmus are mere hollow nuts, and foul the mouth. It has been asked: Is an offence, committed in a moment of intoxication, therefore excusable? Most assuredly not; on the contrary, drunkenness aggravates the fault. Hidden sins unveil themselves when a man’s self-possession goes from him; that which the sober man keeps in his breast, the drunken man lets out at the lips.

Habitual drunkenness: the drunkard who cannot stop

15 passages · 10 writers · 1600s to 1900s

South says God will not take the drunkard's excuse that he cannot leave off, Spurgeon answers no when asked whether such a man is excused, and Baxter describes a drunkard who says he cannot help it though hell comes next. Maclaren says the craving seems to escape the control of the will. Moody and Spurgeon say God or the Holy Spirit helps a man break the habit, Barnes says a reformed drunkard should not touch what nearly ruined him, and Wesley says he has known many habitual drunkards converted.

1710 · Matthew Henry, Commentary on Proverbs 23.29-35

Worst of all, the heart is hardened in the sin, and the sinner, notwithstanding all these present mischiefs that attend it, obstinately persists in it, and hates to be reformed: When shall I awake? Much ado he has to shake off the chains of his drunken sleep; he can hardly get clear of the fumes of the wine, though he strives with them, that (being thirsty in the morning) he may return to it again. So perfectly lost is he to all sense of virtue and honour, and so wretchedly is his conscience seared, that he is not ashamed to say, I will seek it yet again. There is no hope; no, they have loved drunkards, and after them they will go, Jer. ii. 25. This is adding drunkenness to thirst, and following strong drink; those that do so may read their doom Deut. xxix. 19, 20, their woe Isa. v. 11, and, if this be the end of the sin, with good reason were we directed to stop at the beginning of it: Look not upon the wine when it is red.

1823 · Robert South, Sermons Preached Upon Several Occasions, Volume 1 10

Some power to good, no doubt, a man has left him for all this. And therefore, God will not take the drunkard’s excuse, that he has so long accustomed himself to intemperate drinking, that now he cannot leave it off; nor admit of the passionate man’s apology, that he has so long given his unruly passions their head, that he cannot now govern or control them. For these things are not so: since no man is guilty of an act of intemperance of any sort, but he might have forborn it; not without some trouble, I confess, from the strugglings of the contrary habit: but still the thing was possible to be done; and he might, after all, have forborn it. And, as he forbore one act, so he might have forborn another, and after that another, and so on, till he had, by degrees, weakened, and, at length, mortified and extinguished the habit itself.

1883 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 29 (1883) 1746

A man says, "Drink is ruining me, body and soul. I know that it is shortening my life. I have had delirium tremens, and I know that I shall have it again if I continue as I am; but I cannot leave the drink. Sometimes the craving comes over me, and I seem as if I must swallow the intoxicating draught, whether I will or no." Whether this is the devil, or whether it is altogether the man himself, I am not going to argue; but the drink-devil, whose name is legion, is certainly among us to this day, and we hear persons tell us that they are anxious to escape from its power, and yet they return to it, rushing to intoxication as the swine rushed into the sea when the demons had entered into them.