The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Psalm 51

What Christian writers said, from about AD 370 to 1915.

47 passages · 23 writers · 6 centuries

The short answer

Jerome says David wrote Psalm 51 after his sin with Bathsheba and Nathan's rebuke, and that it shows the whole repentance of a sinner, Calvin says Nathan roused David to self-loathing and humiliation before God, and Fausset says the psalm illustrates true repentance. Henry and Spurgeon say David pleads only for mercy, and Spurgeon, Barnes, Henry, and Wesley say his chief grief is that he sinned against God. Calvin, Barnes, and Pusey read 'create in me a clean heart' as God's own work of renewal, Spurgeon and Owen read the hyssop as pointing to the blood of Christ, and Maclaren reads David's cleansing as the work of the great High Priest. Augustine, Calvin, Matthew Henry, and Spurgeon say the broken and contrite heart is the sacrifice God will not despise, while Calvin and Spurgeon add that David's contrition earns no pardon.

The occasion and the plea for mercy (verses 1-2)

9 passages · 7 writers · 300s to 1900s

Jerome says Psalm 51 was written after David's sin with Bathsheba, and Henry says Nathan had assured David of pardon. Henry and Spurgeon read David's plea as resting on God's mercy alone, Calvin says David encouraged himself to hope for pardon by considering God's infinite mercy, and Fausset says the psalm illustrates true repentance.

c. 370–419 · Jerome, Letters 122.3

The whole repentance of a sinner is exhibited to us in the fifty-first psalm written by David after he had gone in unto Bathsheba the wife of Uriah the Hittite, and when, to the rebuke of the prophet Nathan he had replied, “I have sinned.” Immediately that he confessed his fault he was comforted by the words: “the Lord also hath put away thy sin.” He had added murder to adultery; yet bursting into tears he says: “Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy loving kindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions.” A sin so great needed to find great mercy.

1557 · John Calvin, Commentary on the Psalms, part 2 (Psalms 36-66) 51.intro

We learn the cause which led to the composition of this psalm from the title appended to it, and which will immediately come under our consideration. For a long period after his melancholy fall, David would seem to have sunk into a spiritual lethargy; but when roused from it by the expostulation of Nathan, he was filled with self-loathing and humiliation in the sight of God, and was anxious both to testify his repentance to all around him, and leave some lasting proof of it to posterity. In the commencement of the psalm, having his eyes directed to the heinousness of his guilt, he encourages himself to hope for pardon by considering the infinite mercy of God. This he extols in high terms, and with a variety of expressions, as one who felt that he deserved multiplied condemnation. In the after part of the psalm, he prays for restoration to the favor of God, being conscious that he deserved to have been cast off for ever, and deprived of all the gifts of the Holy Spirit. He promises, should forgiveness be bestowed upon him, to retain a deep and grateful sense of it. Towards the conclusion, he declares it to be for the good of the Church that God should grant his request; and, indeed, when the peculiar manner in which God had deposited his covenant of grace with David is considered, it could not but be felt that the common hope of the salvation of all must have been shaken on the supposition of his final rejection.

Confession: against thee only (verses 3-6)

11 passages · 11 writers · 300s to 1900s

Spurgeon, Barnes, Henry, and Wesley say David's chief grief is that he sinned against God. Arndt and Welch connect the words with contrition and godly sorrow, Chalmers prays to feel sin chiefly as sin against God so that his sorrow may be of the godly sort, and Littleton says having sin ever before us is conviction and contrition. Luther reads them as the sense of entire sinfulness, and Augustine says David asks pardon because he acknowledges God's justice.

1765 · John Wesley, Explanatory Notes on Psalms 51.4

Thee only - Which is not to be understood absolutely, because he had sinned against Bathsheba and Uriah, and many others; but comparatively. So the sense is, though I have sinned against my own conscience, and against others; yet nothing is more grievous to me, than that I have sinned against thee.

1872 · Martin Luther, The Treasury of David, vol. 2 (Psalms 27-57) 51.q32

I who was yesterday chaste am to-day an adulterer! I who yesterday had hands innocent of blood, am to-day a man of blood-guiltiness!” And it might be that in this way he derived the feeling sense of his entire sinfulness, from his fall into adultery and murder, and from thence drew this conclusion—that neither the tree nor the fruits of human nature were good, but that the whole was so deformed and lost by sin, that there was nothing sound left in the whole of nature. This I would have the reader bear in mind first of all, if he desire to have the pure meaning of this passage. In the next place, the grammatical construction is to be explained, which seems to be somewhat obscure. For what the translator has rendered by the preterperfect, ought to be the present: “Against thee only do I sin;” that is, I know that before thee I am nothing but a sinner; or, before thee I do nothing but evil continually; that is, my whole life is evil and depraved on account of sin. I cannot boast before thee of merit or of righteousness, but am evil altogether, and in thy sight this is my character—I do evil. I have sinned, I do sin, and shall sin to the end of the chapter.

1911 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 57 (1911) 3278

Against You, You only, have I sinned, and done this evil in Your sight: that You might be justified when You speak, and be clear when You judge. This is the sting of sin to a truly penitent man—that he has sinned against God. The carnal mind sees nothing in that. If ever it does repent, it repents of doing wrong to man. It only takes the manward side of the transgression, but God's child, though grieved at having wronged man, feels that the deluge of his guilt—that which drowns everything else—is that he has sinned against his God! It is the very token and type and mark of an acceptable repentance that it has an eye to sin as committed against God.

Hyssop, a clean heart, and a right spirit (verses 7-12)

14 passages · 9 writers · 300s to 1900s

Calvin, Barnes, Pusey, and Smith read 'create in me a clean heart' as God's work of making something new. Spurgeon, Maclaren, and Owen read the hyssop and the cleansing as pointing to Christ.

1557 · John Calvin, Commentary on the Psalms, part 2 (Psalms 36-66) 51.10

David, by the word which he here uses, describes the work of God in renewing the heart in a manner suitable to its extraordinary nature, representing it as the formation of a new creature. As he had already been endued with the Spirit, he prays in the latter part of the verse that God would renew a right spirit within him. But by the term create, which he had previously employed, he acknowledges that we are indebted entirely to the grace of God, both for our first regeneration, and, in the event of our falling, for subsequent restoration. He does not merely assert that his heart and spirit were weak, requiring divine assistance, but that they must remain destitute of all purity and rectitude till these be communicated from above. By this it appears that our nature is entirely corrupt: for were it possessed of any rectitude or purity, David would not, as in this verse, have called the one a gift of the Spirit, and the other a creation.

1834 · Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Psalms 51.10

Create in me a clean heart, O God - The word rendered "create," ברא berâ' - is a word which is properly employed to denote an act of "creation;" that is, of causing something to exist where there was nothing before. It is the word which is used in Gen 1:1 : "In the beginning God "created" the heaven and the earth," and which is commonly used to express the act of creation. It is used "here" evidently in the sense of causing that to exist which did not exist before; and there is clearly a recognition of the divine "power," or a feeling on the part of David that this could be done by God alone. The idea is, however, not that a new "substance" might be brought into being to which the name "a clean heart" might be given, but that he might "have" a clean heart; that his heart might be made pure; that his affections and feelings might be made right; that he might have what he was conscious that he did "not" now possess - a clean or a pure heart. This, he felt, could be produced only by the power of God; and the passage, therefore, proves that it is a doctrine of the Old Testament, as it is of the New, that the human heart is changed only by a divine agency.

1908–1909 · Alexander Maclaren, Expositions of Holy Scripture: Psalms 51.1-2

That is the technical word for the priestly act of declaring ceremonial cleanness—the cessation of ceremonial pollution, and for the other priestly act of making, as well as declaring, clean from the stains of leprosy. And with allusion to both of these uses, the Psalmist employs it here. That is to say, he thinks of his guilt not only as a blotted past record which he has written, not only as a garment spotted by the flesh which his spirit wears, but he thinks of it too as inhering in himself, as a leprosy and disease of his own personal nature. He thinks of it as being, like that, incurable, fatal, twin sister to and precursor of death; and he thinks of it as capable of being cleansed only by a sacerdotal act, only by the great High Priest and by His finger being laid upon it. And we know who it was that—when the leper, whom no man in Israel was allowed to touch on pain of uncleanness, came to His feet—put out His hand in triumphant consciousness of power, and touched him, and said, ‘I will! be thou clean.’ Let this be thy prayer, ‘Cleanse me from my sin’; and Christ will answer, ‘Thy leprosy hath departed from thee.’

The broken and contrite heart (verses 16-17)

13 passages · 9 writers · 300s to 1900s

Augustine, Watson, Henry, and Baker describe the broken and contrite heart as the sacrifice God desires, and Spurgeon and Barnes set it against material sacrifices. Calvin and Spurgeon say David's contrition is not the ground of his pardon.

c. 392–422 · Augustine of Hippo, Expositions on the Psalms (Enarrationes in Psalmos) 131.2

Whence do we prove that he hath offered a sacrifice? Because humility of heart is a sacrifice.…If there is no sacrifice, there is no Priest. But if we have a High Priest in Heaven, who intercedeth with the Father for us (for He hath entered into the Holy of Holies, within the veil),…we are safe, for we have a Priest; let us offer our sacrifice there. Let us consider what sacrifice we ought to offer; for God is not pleased with burnt-offerings, as ye have heard in the Psalm. But in that place he next showeth what he offereth: “The sacrifice of God is a troubled spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, shalt Thou not despise.

1557 · John Calvin, Commentary on the Psalms, part 2 (Psalms 36-66) 51.17

I would observe, that faith cannot be separated from the humility of which David speaks. This is such a humility as is altogether unknown to the wicked. They may tremble in the presence of God, and the obstinacy and rebellion of their hearts may be partially restrained, but they still retain some remainders of inward pride. Where the spirit has been broken, on the other hand, and the heart has become contrite, through a felt sense of the anger of the Lord, a man is brought to genuine fear and self-loathing, with a deep conviction that of himself he can do or deserve nothing, and must be indebted unconditionally for salvation to Divine mercy. That this should be represented by David as constituting all which God desires in the shape of sacrifice, need not excite our surprise. He does not exclude faith, he does not condescend upon any nice division of true penitence into its several parts, but asserts in general, that the only way of obtaining the favor of God is by prostrating ourselves with a wounded heart at the feet of his Divine mercy, and supplicating his grace with ingenuous confessions of our own helplessness.

1905 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 51 (1905) 2934

David has to feel that it is better to have one genuine sigh for sin than to make ten thousand bulls shed their blood upon the sacrificial altar! And if you are truly broken from your sin—if you do really hate it, and cry to God for the pardon of it—if the Spirit of God has really given you complete cleansing from your guilt by the precious blood of Jesus—this is better than all the material sacrifices offered in all the temples that were ever built and overlaid with gold!