The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Faith without works is dead: James 2:14-26

What Christian writers said, from about AD 402 to 1949.

54 passages · 33 writers · 8 centuries

The short answer

James 2:14-26 asks whether a faith that someone says he has, but that has no works, can save him, and the writers call such faith dead. They say living faith works by love, and that works are its fruit and evidence. On James 2:19, Wesley and Fausset say that believing that there is one God is a faith the devils share, and that the devils tremble. On Paul and James, Wesley and Owen say the two apostles do not contradict each other. Calvin, Owen, and Barnes say Paul and James treat different questions or senses of justification.

Faith and works: dead faith, working faith, and fruit

30 passages · 25 writers · 400s to 1900s

Anselm says faith without love is dead, and Augustine, quoting James, says faith that works evil and not good is dead, being alone. Anselm, Augustine, and Spurgeon say that faith works by love. Calvin, Edwards, the Thirty-Nine Articles, and the Baptist Confession of 1689 treat works as the fruit or evidence of faith.

c. 421–422 · Augustine of Hippo, Enchiridion on Faith, Hope, and Love 67

I have written a book on this subject, entitled Of Faith and Works, in which, to the best of my ability, God assisting me, I have shown from Scripture, that the faith which saves us is that which the Apostle Paul clearly enough describes when he says: “For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by love.” But if it worketh evil, and not good, then without doubt, as the Apostle James says, “it is dead, being alone.” The same apostle says again, “What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? Can faith save him?”

1075–1076 · Anselm of Canterbury, Monologium 77

Hence, with however great confidence so important a truth is believed, the faith will be useless and, as it were, dead, unless it is strong and living through love. For, that the faith which is accompanied by sufficient love is by no means idle, if an opportunity of operation offers, but rather exercises itself in an abundance of works, as it could not do without love, may be proved from this fact alone, that, since it loves the supreme Justice, it can scorn nothing that is just, it can approve nothing that is unjust. Therefore, seeing that the fact of its operation shows that life, without which it could not operate, is inherent in it; it is not absurd to say that operative faith is alive, because it has the life of love without which it could not operate; and that idle faith is not living, because it lacks that life of love, with which it would not be idle. Hence, if not only he who has lost his sight is called blind, but also he who ought to have sight and has it not, why cannot, in like manner, faith without love be called dead; not because it has lost its life, that is, love; but because it has not the life which it ought always to have? As that faith, then, which operates through love is recognised as living, so that which is idle, through contempt, is proved to be dead. It may, therefore, be said with sufficient fitness that living faith believes in that in which we ought to believe; while dead faith merely believes that which ought to be believed.

1746 · Jonathan Edwards, A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections 3.12

Holy practice is the proper evidence of a saving faith. It is evident that the Apostle James speaks of works, as what do eminently justify faith, or (which is the same thing) justify the professors of faith, and vindicate and manifest the sincerity of their profession, not only to the world, but to their own consciences; as is evident by the instance he gives of Abraham, James 2:21-24. And in verses 20 and 26, he speaks of the practical and working nature of faith, as the very life and soul of it; in the same manner that the active nature and substance, which is in the body of a man, is the life and soul of that.

James and Paul on justification

13 passages · 11 writers · 1500s to 1900s

Wesley, Owen, and Melanchthon say that there is no contradiction between James and Paul. Calvin, Owen, and Barnes say that Paul and James treat different questions or senses of justification, and Wesley says they speak of different faiths and different works. Berkhof says the justification in James 2:24 is a further justification of the believing Abraham, and Schaff says James opposed dead Jewish orthodoxy while Paul opposed self-righteous legalism.

c. 1550–1551 · John Calvin, Commentary on James 2.21

We have already said that James does not speak here of the cause of justification, or of the manner how men obtain righteousness, and this is plain to every one; but that his object was only to shew that good works are always connected with faith; and, therefore, since he declares that Abraham was justified by works, he is speaking of the proof he gave of his justification. When, therefore, the Sophists set up James against Paul, they go astray through the ambiguous meaning of a term. When Paul says that we are justified by faith, he means no other thing than that by faith we are counted righteous before God. But James has quite another thing in view, even to shew that he who professes that he has faith, must prove the reality of his faith by his works. Doubtless James did not mean to teach us here the ground on which our hope of salvation ought to rest; and it is this alone that Paul dwells upon. That we may not then fall into that false reasoning which has deceived the Sophists, we must take notice of the two fold meaning, of the word justified. Paul means by it the gratuitous imputation of righteousness before the tribunal of God; and James, the manifestation of righteousness by the conduct, and that before men, as we may gather from the preceding words, “Shew to me thy faith,” etc.

1754 · John Wesley, Explanatory Notes on James 2.24

Ye see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only - St. Paul, on the other hand, declares, "A man is justified by faith," and not by works, Rom. iii, 28. And yet there is no contradiction between the apostles: because, 1. They do not speak of the same faith: St. Paul speaking of living faith; St. James here, of dead faith. 2. They do not speak of the same works: St. Paul speaking of works antecedent to faith; St. James, of works subsequent to it.

1949 · Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology 4.9

The difference between the representations of Paul and James is unquestionably due partly to the nature of the adversaries with which they had to deal. Paul had to contend with legalists who sought to base their justification, at least in part, on the works of the law. James, on the other hand, joined issue with Antinomians, who claimed to have faith, but whose faith was merely an intellectual assent to the truth (2:19), and who denied the necessity of good works. Therefore he stresses the fact that faith without works is a dead faith, and consequently not at all a faith that justifies. The faith that justifies is a faith that is fruitful in good works.

James 2:19: the devils also believe, and tremble

11 passages · 10 writers · 400s to 1900s

Calvin, Wesley, Fausset, Barnes, and Tillotson say that belief that there is one God, as devils hold it, does not save. Robertson says belief that God exists is not belief or trust in God. Augustine says the devils had faith but not charity, and Spurgeon says they believe all the facts of Revelation but are not saved.

c. 406–421 · Augustine of Hippo, Tractates on the Gospel of John (In Iohannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV) 6.21

“If I should know all mysteries, and have prophecy and all faith, so that I could remove mountains;” in case thou shouldest say this, “I believe; enough for me.” But what says James? “The devils believe and tremble.” Faith is mighty, but without charity it profits nothing. The devils confessed Christ. Accordingly it was from believing, but not from loving, they said, “What have we to do with Thee?” They had faith, but not charity; hence they were devils. Boast not of faith; so far thou art on a level with the devils.

c. 1550–1551 · John Calvin, Commentary on James 2.19

From this one sentence it appears evident that the whole dispute is not about faith, but of the common knowledge of God, which can no more connect man with God, than the sight of the sun carry him up to heaven; but it is certain that by faith we come nigh to God. Besides, it would be ridiculous were any one to say, that the devils have faith; and James prefers them in this respect to hypocrites. The devil trembles, he says, at the mention of God’s name, because when he acknowledges his own judge he is filled with the fear of him. He then who despises an acknowledged God is much worse.

1914 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 60 (1914) 3434

Devils believe all the facts of Revelation. I do not believe they have a doubt—they have suffered too much from the hand of God to doubt His existence! They have felt too much the terror of His wrath to doubt the righteousness of His government! They are stern believers, but they are not saved— and such a faith, if it is in us, will not, cannot save us—but will remain to all intents and purposes, a dead, inoperative faith! It is a faith which produces works which saves us.