The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Jesus wept (John 11:35)

What Christian writers said, from about AD 356 to 1930.

43 passages · 17 writers · 6 centuries

The short answer

The writers say Jesus wept at Lazarus's grave out of sympathy with Mary, Martha, and the mourners. Wesley adds that Jesus wept from a deep sense of the misery sin had brought on human nature, and Maclaren says he wept at the effects of death and was angry at sin, its cause. Hilary says the tears prove the reality of his assumed manhood, and Ambrose says he wept for what affected us, not himself, since the Godhead sheds no tears. Spurgeon, Ryle, Whitefield, and Barnes say weeping for the dead is not sin, though Spurgeon adds that mourning must not become murmuring. Edwards says the bereaved may go to Jesus and spread their sorrows before him, since he has the same compassion now, and Ryle says he is still touched with the feeling of our infirmities and understands tears.

Why Jesus wept

19 passages · 12 writers · 300s to 1900s

The writers give several reasons for the tears. Wesley names sympathy and the misery sin brought, Maclaren says Christ wept at the effects of death and was angry at sin, and Hilary says the tears prove Christ's real manhood.

c. 356–360 · Hilary of Poitiers, On the Trinity (De Trinitate) 10.55

Again, how great a mystery of word and act it is that Christ wept, that His eyes filled with tears from the anguish of His mind. Whence came this defect in His soul that sorrow should wring tears from His body? What bitter fate, what unendurable pain, could move to a flood of tears the Son of Man Who descended from heaven? Again, what was it in Him which wept? God the Word? or His human soul? For though weeping is a bodily function, the body is but a servant; tears are, as it were, the sweat of the agonised soul.

1887 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 33 (1887) 1944

Such is to be gathered from the original word. He wept copiously and continuously till He became the observed of all observers. He was deeply affected and His tears were the fit expression of His intense emotion. Love made Him weep—nothing else ever compelled Him to tears. I do not find that all the pains He endured, even when scourged or when fastened to the cruel Cross, fetched a single tear from Him—but for love's sake—"Jesus wept." At first I feel inclined to say, "Behold, how He wept!" And then I check myself and, borrowing my language from the bystanders, I cry, "Behold, how He loved him!"

1905–1910 · Alexander Maclaren, Expositions of Holy Scripture: John (chapters 1 to 14) 11.30-45

The only worthy explanation of that strange ingredient in Christ’s agitation is that it was directed against the source of death,—namely, sin. He saw the cause manifested in the effects. He wept for the one, He was wroth at the other. The tears witnessed to the perfect love of the man, and of the God revealed in the man; the indignation witnessed to the recoil and aversion from sin of the perfectly righteous Man, and of the holy God manifested in Him. We get one glimpse into His heart, as on to some ocean heaving and mist-covered. The momentary sight proclaims the union in Him, as the Incarnate Word, of pity for our woes and of aversion from our sins. His question as to the place of the tomb is not what we should have expected; but its very abruptness indicates effort to suppress emotion, and resolve to lose no time in redressing the grief. Most sweetly human are the tears that start afresh after the moment’s repression, as the little company begin to move towards the grave.

Tears are not sin

9 passages · 4 writers · 1700s to 1800s

Spurgeon, Ryle, Whitefield, and Barnes say that weeping at a death is not wrong, and Spurgeon adds that mourning has a boundary it must not pass.

1771–1772 · George Whitefield, Selected Sermons 39

He wept, to show us, that it was no sin to shed a tear of love and resignation at the grave of a deceased friend; he wept, to see what havoc sin had made in the world, and how it had reduced man, who was originally little lower than the angels, (by making him subject to death) to a level with the beasts that perish: but above all, he wept at the foresight of the people's unbelief; he wept, to think how many then present, would not only not believe on, but would be hardened, and have their prejudices increased more and more against him, though he should raise Lazarus from the dead before their eyes.

1856–1869 · J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: John 11.30-37

Weeping and mourning are sadly trying to flesh and blood, and make us feel the weakness of our mortal nature. But they are not in themselves wrong. Even the Son of God wept. It shows us that deep feeling is not a thing of which we need be ashamed. To be cold and stoical and unmoved in the sight of sorrow is no sign of grace. There is nothing unworthy of a child of God in tears. Even the Son of God could weep. It shows us, above all, that the Savior in whom believers trust is a most tender and feeling Savior. He is one who can be touched with sympathy for our infirmities.

1889 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 35 (1889) 2091

Learn instruction—tears which else we might have regarded as contraband have now free admission into the realm of holiness, since "Jesus wept." Sister, you may weep, for Jesus wept. He wept, with full knowledge of the happiness of Lazarus, with full expectation of his resurrection and with the firm assurance that God was glorified even by his death—we may not, therefore, condemn what Christ allows. "Jesus wept," but He did not sin. There was not even a particle of evil in any one of the Redeemer's tears.

Christ's sympathy with mourners

15 passages · 6 writers · 1500s to 1900s

Calvin, Edwards, and Ryle say Christ shares the sorrow of the bereaved. Edwards and Ryle say he is the same now.

1553 · John Calvin, Commentary on John, part 1 (chapters 1-11) 11.33

If Christ had not been excited to compassion by their tears, he would rather have kept his countenance unmoved, but when, of his own accord, he conforms to those mourners, so far as to weep along with them, he gives proof that he has sympathy, (συμπάθεια.) For the cause of this feeling is, in my opinion, expressed by the Evangelist, when he says that Christ saw Mary and the rest weeping. Yet I have no doubt that Christ contemplated something higher, namely, the general misery of the whole human race; for he knew well what had been enjoined on him by the Father, and why he was sent into the world, namely, to free us from all evils. As he has actually done this, so he intended to show that he accomplished it with warmth and earnestness. Accordingly, when he is about to raise Lazarus, before granting deliverance or aid, by the groaning of his spirit, by a strong feeling of grief, and by tears, he shows that he is as much affected by our distresses as if he had endured them in his own person.

1710–1714 · Matthew Henry, Commentary on John 11.33-44

As he was going to the grave, as if he had been following the corpse thither, Jesus wept, v. 35. A very short verse, but it affords many useful instructions. [1.] That Jesus Christ was really and truly man, and partook with the children, not only of flesh and blood, but of a human soul, susceptible of the impressions of joy, and grief, and other affections. Christ gave this proof of his humanity, in both senses of the word; that, as a man, he could weep, and, as a merciful man, he would weep, before he gave this proof of his divinity. [2.] That he was a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief, as was foretold, Isa. liii. 3. We never read that he laughed, but more than once we have him in tears. Thus he shows not only that a mournful state will consist with the love of God, but that those who sow to the Spirit must sow in tears. [3.] Tears of compassion well become Christians, and make them most to resemble Christ. It is a relief to those who are in sorrow to have their friends sympathize with them, especially such a friend as their Lord Jesus.

1856–1869 · J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: John 11.30-37

Let us carefully remark that our Lord never changes. He did not leave behind Him His human nature when He ascended up into heaven. At this moment, at God’s right hand, He can be touched with the feeling of our infirmities and can understand tears as well as ever. Our great High Priest is the very Friend that our souls need, able to save as God, able to feel as man.