The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Hebrews 12:6: whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth

What Christian writers said, from about AD 80 to 1912.

51 passages · 27 writers · 10 centuries

The short answer

Writers read Hebrews 12:6, quoting Proverbs 3:11-12, as showing that God chastens those He loves. Several say that a child who is never chastened is not a true son, so chastening is a sign of sonship. Spurgeon says God does not punish his people with a vindictive infliction but chastens as a father, Jerome distinguishes smiting with a parent's affection from cruelty toward adversaries, and Barnes says chastening is correction for faults meant to bring wandering children back. They note that chastening is grievous for the present but afterward yields the peaceable fruit of righteousness. Calvin, Charnock, and Maclaren say chastening brings believers God's holiness, and Calvin adds that it renews them for a celestial life.

Whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth

14 passages · 14 writers · 1st c. to 1900s

Gregory the Great says the sick should feel themselves to be sons of God because the scourge of discipline chastises them. Calvin says chastisements are a demonstration of God's paternal love toward the elect, and Augustine and Maclaren describe God's chastening as a father's discipline for the child's good.

590–591 · Gregory the Great, The Book of Pastoral Rule (Regula pastoralis) 3.12

But, on the other hand, the sick are to be admonished that they feel themselves to be sons of God in that the scourge of discipline chastises them. For, unless He purposed to give them an inheritance after correction, He would not have a care to educate them by afflictions. For hence the Lord says to John by the angel, Whom I love I rebuke and chasten (Rev. iii. 19; Prov. iii. 11). Hence again it is written, My son despise not thou the discipline of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of Him. For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth (Heb. xii. 5, 6).

1549 · John Calvin, Commentary on Hebrews 12.6

For whom the Lord loveth, etc. This seems not to be a well-founded reason; for God visits the elect as well as the reprobate indiscriminately, and his scourges manifest his wrath oftener than his love; and so the Scripture speaks, and experience confirms. But yet it is no wonder that when the godly are addressed, the effect of chastisements which they feel, is alone referred to. For however severe and angry a judge God may show himself towards the reprobate, whenever he punishes them; yet he has no other end in view as to the elect, but to promote their salvation; it is a demonstration of his paternal love.

1908 · Alexander Maclaren, Expositions of Holy Scripture: Ecclesiastes 1.13

But the recognition of the hand that ministers the discipline is needed to complete the peacefulness of faith. It would be a dreary world if we could only think of some inscrutable or impersonal power that inflicted the discipline; but if in its sharpest pangs we give ‘reverence to the Father of spirits,’ we shall ‘live.’ Of course, a loving father sees to his children’s education, and a loving child cannot but believe that the father’s single purpose in all his discipline is his good. The good that is sought to be attained by the sharpest chastisement is better than the good that is given by weak indulgence. When the father’s hand wields the rod, and a loving child receives the strokes, they may sting, but they do not wound. The ‘fathers of our flesh chasten us after their own pleasure,’ and there may be error and arbitrariness in their action; and the child may sometimes nourish a right sense of injustice, but ‘the Father of spirits’ makes no mistakes, and never strikes too hard. ‘He for our profit’ carries with it the declaration that the deep heart of God doth not willingly afflict, and seeks in afflicting for nothing but His children’s good.

Sons and not bastards

10 passages · 8 writers · 300s to 1900s

Chrysostom, Bayly, Taylor, and Spurgeon say being without chastisement marks one as not a son. Augustine says to fear being disinherited rather than scourged.

c. 392–422 · Augustine of Hippo, Expositions on the Psalms (Enarrationes in Psalmos) 89.29

“I will visit their offences with the rod, and their sin with scourges” (ver. 32). It is not the mercy of one that calls them only; but also that chastises and scourges them. Let therefore thy Father’s hand be upon thee, and if thou art a good son, repel not chastening; for “what son is there, to whom his father giveth not chastening?” Let Him chasten him, so long as He takes not from him His mercy: let Him beat him when obstinate, as long as He does not disinherit him. If thou hast well understood the promises of thy Father, fear not to be scourged, but to be disinherited: “for whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth: and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.”

c. 403–404 · John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Epistle to the Hebrews 29.3

Seest thou how he brings up arguments from all quarters, from facts in the Scripture, from its words, from our own notions, from examples in ordinary life? ( Ver. 8.) “But if ye be without chastisement” [&c.]. Seest thou that he said what I just mentioned, that it is not possible to be a son without being chastened? For as in families, fathers care not for bastards, though they learn nothing, though they be not distinguished, but fear for their legitimate sons lest they should be indolent, [so here.]. If then not to be chastised is [a mark] of bastards, we ought to rejoice at chastisement, if this be [a sign] of legitimacy. “God dealeth with you as with sons”; for this very cause.

1847 · Henry Edward Manning, Sermons, Volume 3 16

GOD has declared so plainly, that He rebukes and chastens all whom He loves, that we can hardly dare desire to be free from chastisement. Much as we shrink from the thought of God’s heavy hand coming down upon our weakness, of the sharpness of bodily pain, and of the anguish of affliction, yet we must still more shrink from such words as, “If ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons: for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?”

The peaceable fruit of righteousness

17 passages · 14 writers · 400s to 1900s

Cassian, Fausset, Wesley, and Calvin say chastening is grievous now but yields righteousness and holiness afterward.

c. 426–429 · John Cassian, Conferences (Conlationes) 6.6

For when a doctor for the sake of health with good reason either cuts or cauterizes those who are suffering from the inflammation of ulcers, it is considered an evil by those who have to bear it. Nor are the spur and the whip pleasant to a restive horse. Moreover all chastisement seems at the moment to be a bitter thing to those who are chastised, as the Apostle says: “Now all chastisement for the present indeed seemeth not to bring with it joy but sorrow; but afterwards it will yield to them that are exercised by it most peaceable fruits of righteousness,” and “whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth: for what son is there whom the father doth not correct?”

1549 · John Calvin, Commentary on Hebrews 12.11

Now no chastening, etc. This he adds, lest we should measure God’s chastisements by our present feelings; for he shows that we are like children who dread the rod and shun it as much as they can, for owing to their age they cannot yet judge how useful it may be to them. The object, then, of this admonition is, that chastisements cannot be estimated aright if judged according to what the flesh feels under them, and that therefore we must fix our eyes on the end: we shall thus receive the peaceable fruit of righteousness. And by the fruit of righteousness he means the fear of the Lord and a godly and holy life, of which the cross is the teacher. He calls it peaceable, because in adversities we are alarmed and disquieted, being tempted by impatience, which is always noisy and restless; but being chastened, we acknowledge with a resigned mind how profitable did that become to us which before seemed bitter and grievous.

1754 · John Wesley, Explanatory Notes on Hebrews 12.11

Now all chastening - Whether from our earthly or heavenly Father, Is for the present grievous, yet it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness - Holiness and happiness. To them that are exercised thereby - That receive this exercise as from God, and improve it according to his will.

1877 · J. C. Ryle, Holiness: Its Nature, Hindrances, Difficulties, and Roots 6

Sickness, and losses, and crosses, and anxieties, and disappointments seem absolutely needful to keep us humble, watchful, and spiritual-minded. They are as needful as the pruning knife to the vine, and the refiner’s furnace to the gold. They are not pleasant to flesh and blood. We do not like them, and often do not see their meaning. “No chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless, afterward, it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness.” (Heb. xii. 11.) We shall find that all worked for our good when we reach heaven. Let these thoughts abide in our minds, if we love growth in grace.

Correction for the child's good

10 passages · 8 writers · 300s to 1900s

Barnes says chastening is correction for faults to bring wandering children back. Spurgeon says God does not punish his people with a vindictive infliction but chastens as a father, and Jerome distinguishes smiting with a parent's affection from cruelty toward adversaries.

415 · Jerome, Dialogue Against the Pelagians (Dialogi contra Pelagianos) 1.28

Every impious person is wicked and a sinner; but we cannot conversely say every sinner and wicked person is also impious, for impiety properly belongs to those who have not the knowledge of God, or, if they have once had it, lose it by transgression. But the wounds of sin and wickedness, like faults in general, admit of healing. Hence, it is written, “Many are the scourges of the sinner”; it is not said that he is eternally destroyed. And through all the scourging and torture the faults of Israel are corrected, “For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.” It is one thing to smite with the affection of a teacher and a parent; another to be madly cruel towards adversaries.

1834 · Albert Barnes, Notes on the Bible: Hebrews 12.5

The word rendered here "chastening" - παιδεία paideia - and also in Heb 12:6-8, and in Heb 12:9, "corrected" - παιδευτὰς paideutas - does not refer to affliction in general, but that kind of affliction which is designed to correct us for our faults, or which is of the nature of discipline. The verb properly relates to the training up of a child - including instruction, counsel, discipline, and correction (see this use of the verb in Act 7:22; 2Ti 2:25; Tit 2:12), and then especially discipline or correction for faults - to "correct, chastise, chasten;" 1Co 11:32; 2Co 6:9; Rev 3:19. This is the meaning here; and the idea is, not that God will afflict his people in general, but that if they wander away he will correct them for their faults. He will bring calamity upon them as a punishment for their offences, and in order to bring them back to himself. He will not suffer them to wander away unrebuked and unchecked, but will mercifully reclaim them though by great sufferings. Afflictions have many objects, or produce many happy effects. That referred to here is, that they are means of reclaiming the wandering and erring children of God, and are proofs of his paternal care and love; compare 2Sa 7:14; 2Sa 12:13-14; Psa 89:31-34; Pro 3:11-12.

1911 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 57 (1911) 3239

God never punishes His people for sin in the sense of a loyal and vindictive infliction. That would be unjust, for Christ, their Substitute, was once and for all punished in their place. They owe no debts to Divine Justice, for all their debts were paid by Christ to the utmost farthing. But now they are placed under a different government. They are not summoned before a judge, but they are put under parental care—and like as a father chastens every child who he loves, so our heavenly Father chastens us. Again, I say not with a legislative punishment for sin, but with a father's chastisement for our offenses.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.