The Monastic Pint Answers from church history on today's questions

Will we know each other in heaven?

What Christian writers said, from about AD 206 to 1914.

50 passages · 27 writers · 9 centuries

The short answer

Watson, Whitefield, Hodge, and Spurgeon argue from the disciples knowing Moses and Elijah, Whitefield and Wesley from Lazarus being known by Dives and Abraham, and Spurgeon and Hodge from the saints sitting down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, that the blessed will know one another. Tertullian (c. 210-217) answers the objection from Matthew 22:30 by saying we shall rise to a spiritual consortship and recognise those who are ours, Augustine, quoted by Manning, says the saints will recognise one another by a higher knowledge, and Hodge says we shall know the prophets, apostles, and martyrs without introduction. On marriage, Jerome, Augustine, Henry, Ryle, and Chrysostom read Matthew 22:30 as saying there is no marriage in the resurrection, and Henry and Ryle give the reason that there is no death and so no need of births. Spurgeon says there are no husbands and wives, as such, in heaven, though Jesus remains our Kinsman and Brother, and Barnes says the passage does not deny that there will be recollection and recognition of former marriages. On the body, Watson says the raised bodies will be agile and full of brightness like Christ's glorious body (Philippians 3:21), and Spurgeon and Fausset say the raised body is a real body.

Will the blessed know one another?

29 passages · 21 writers · 200s to 1900s

Watson, Whitefield, Hodge, Henry, and Spurgeon argue from Peter, James, and John knowing Moses and Elijah on the mount that the saints will know one another. Wesley points to Abraham and Lazarus knowing each other in hades, and Whitefield and Bayly to Dives knowing Lazarus. Spurgeon says the communion of saints requires mutual recognition, Hodge says we shall recognize our friends and know the prophets, apostles, and martyrs without introduction, and Barnes says that because Paul expected to recognize the Thessalonian converts we may hope to know our pious friends. Tertullian answers the objection from Matthew 22:30 by saying we shall rise to a spiritual consortship and recognise those who are ours, and Manning quotes Augustine that the mutual recognition of that place shall come from a higher knowledge. Luther says we shall find our relations and friends among the just, Baxter says our friends and old acquaintance, whose society in the flesh we delighted in, are among the elder brethren in the New Jerusalem, and Evodius says the soul will be able to remember and recognise friends who went before and those left below. Ryle says the raised bodies will be so like their earthly bodies that those who knew them once shall know them again, and Spurgeon says the spiritual body will keep so much identity that we shall say of it, "This is the body that sprang from such a seed."

c. 210–217 · Tertullian, On Monogamy (De monogamia) 10

“But if ‘in that age they will neither marry nor be given in marriage, but will be equal to angels,’ is not the fact that there will be no restitution of the conjugal relation a reason why we shall not be bound to our departed consorts?” Nay, but the more shall we be bound (to them), because we are destined to a better estate—destined (as we are) to rise to a spiritual consortship, to recognise as well our own selves as them who are ours. Else how shall we sing thanks to God to eternity, if there shall remain in us no sense and memory of this debt; if we shall be re-formed in substance, not in consciousness? Consequently, we who shall be with God shall be together; since we shall all be with the one God—albeit the wages be various, albeit there be “many mansions”, in the house of the same Father having laboured for the “one penny” of the self-same hire, that is, of eternal life; in which (eternal life) God will still less separate them whom He has conjoined, than in this lesser life He forbids them to be separated.

1692 · Thomas Watson, A Body of Divinity, Contained in Sermons upon the Westminster Assembly's Catechism 7.2

Will the saints in glory know each other? Certainly they shall; for our knowledge in heaven shall not be diminished, but increased. We shall not only know our friends and godly relations, but those glorified saints whom we never saw before. It must be so; for society without acquaintance is not comfortable. Of this opinion were Augustine, Anselm, and Luther. Indeed, the Scripture seems to hint as much to us; for, if Peter in the transfiguration knew Moses and Elias, whom he never saw before, Matt 17: 3, then surely in heaven the saints shall know one another, and be infinitely delighted in each other's company. [3] The third thing comprehended in glory is perfection in holiness. Holiness is the beauty of God and angels; it makes heaven.

1872 · Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, vol. 3 (Part III, chapters XV-XX; Part IV, Eschatology) 4.2.1

This leads to the further remark that we shall not only recognize our friends in heaven, but also know, without introduction, prophets, apostles, confessors, and martyrs, of whom we have read or heard while here on earth. (a.) This is altogether probable from the nature of the case. If the future body is to be the same with the present, why should not that sameness, whatever else it may include, include a certain sameness of appearance. (b.) When Moses and Elias appeared on the mount with Christ, they were at once known by the disciples. Their appearance corresponded so exactly with the conceptions formed from the Old Testament account of their character and conduct, that no doubt was entertained on the subject. (c.) It is said that we are to sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. This implies that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob will be known; and if they are known surely others will be known also. (d.) It is promised that our cup of happiness will then be full; but it could not be full, unless we met in heaven those whom we loved on earth. Man is a social being with a soul full of social affections, and as he is to be a man in heaven, is it not likely that he will retain all his social affections there? God would hardly have put this pure yearning in the hearts of his people if it were never to be gratified.

Marriage in the resurrection

13 passages · 11 writers · 200s to 1900s

Jerome, Augustine, Henry, Ryle, and Chrysostom read Matthew 22:30 as saying there is no marriage in the resurrection. Jerome and Augustine say the distinction of the sexes remains although there is no marriage, and Jerome says the likeness to the angels promised is one of mode of life and bliss, not a change of nature. Henry and Ryle give the reason that there is no death and so no need of births, and Henry adds that the joys of heaven arise from the marriage of all the saints to the Lamb, not of any of them to one another. Hodge says the saints are like the angels not in being incorporeal but in being immortal and not needing reproduction, and Tertullian says Christ said "equal unto the angels" so as to leave their humanity unimpaired. Barnes says "as the angels" refers to connections and relations and that the special relation of marriage will not exist, but that the passage does not affirm that there will be no recollection or recognition of former marriages. Spurgeon says there are no husbands and wives, as such, in heaven, though Jesus will always be our Kinsman and Brother, and also says that Christ and his Church shall celebrate their nuptials in heaven. Augustine says a good Christian would wish his wife to live with him after the resurrection, once she has undergone the angelic change, loving in her what is human and hating the conjugal connection. Aquinas says it is ridiculous to seek bodily pleasures where the highest delights in the vision of God are in view, citing Matthew 22:30, and Wesley says those accounted worthy of that world neither marry nor die.

c. 370–419 · Jerome, Letters 108.23

But as to your objection taken from marriage, that, if the members shall remain the same, marriage must inevitably be allowed; it is disposed of by the Saviour’s words: “ye do err not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage but are as the angels.” When it is said that they neither marry nor are given in marriage, the distinction of sex is shewn to persist. For no one says of things which have no capacity for marriage such as a stick or a stone that they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but this may well be said of those who while they can marry yet abstain from doing so by their own virtue and by the grace of Christ. But if you cavil at this and say, how shall we in that case be like the angels with whom there is neither male nor female, hear my answer in brief as follows. What the Lord promises to us is not the nature of angels but their mode of life and their bliss. And therefore John the Baptist is called an angel even before he is beheaded, and all God’s holy men and virgins manifest in themselves even in this world the life of angels. When it is said “ye shall be like the angels,” likeness only is promised and not a change of nature.

1710–1714 · Matthew Henry, Commentary on Matthew 22.23-33

It is not like the state we are now in upon earth; They neither marry, nor are given in marriage. In our present state marriage is necessary; it was instituted in innocency; whatever intermission or neglect there has been of other institutions, this was never laid aside, nor will be till the end of time. In the old world, they were marrying, and giving in marriage; the Jews in Babylon, when cut off from other ordinances, yet were bid to take them wives, Jer. xxix. 6. All civilized nations have had a sense of the obligation of the marriage covenant; and it is requisite for the gratifying of the desires, and recruiting the deficiencies, of the human nature. But, in the resurrection, there is no occasion for marriage; whether in glorified bodies there will be any distinction of sexes some too curiously dispute (the ancients are divided in their opinions about it); but, whether there will be a distinction or not, it is certain that there will be no conjunction; where God will be all in all, there needs no other meet-help; the body will be spiritual, and there will be in it no carnal desires to be gratified: when the mystical body is completed, there will be no further occasion to seek a godly seed, which was one end of the institution of marriage, Mal. ii. 15. In heaven there will be no decay of the individuals, and therefore no eating and drinking; no decay of the species, and therefore no marrying; where there shall be no more deaths (Rev. xxi. 4), there need be no more births. The married state is a composition of joys and cares; those that enter upon it are taught to look upon it as subject to changes, richer and poorer, sickness and health; and therefore it is fit for this mixed, changing world; but as in hell, where there is no joy, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride shall be heard no more at all, so in heaven, where there is all joy, and no care or pain or trouble, there will be no marrying. The joys of that state are pure and spiritual, and arise from the marriage of all of them to the Lamb, not of any of them to one another.

1856–1869 · J. C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Mark 12.18-27

Death being no more--there shall be no need of births to supply the place of those who are removed. Enjoying the full presence of God and His Christ--men and women shall no more need the marriage union, in order to help one another. Able to serve God without weariness, and attend on Him without distraction--doing His will perfectly, and seeing His face continually--clothed in a glorious body--they shall be "as the angels which are in heaven."

What the saints will be like

8 passages · 8 writers · 200s to 1800s

Spurgeon says the resurrection is of this actual body, a solid, substantial body of flesh and blood, not an airy, fantastic body. Henry says the body that is destroyed in the grave shall be raised again, a glorious body, and Fausset says the resurrection body will still be a body though spiritual, substantially retaining personal identity. Watson says the bodies of the saints will be agile and full of clarity and brightness like Christ's glorious body (Philippians 3:21). Edwards says the glory of the saints' bodies will be far greater than the glory of the place made as their dwelling. Origen says those who deserve an inheritance in the kingdom of heaven receive a spiritual body capable of inhabiting the heavens. Hodge says that as we have borne the image of the earthly we shall bear the image of the heavenly, and Owen says God designs our bodies to such refinement at the resurrection that they will be equal to the angels.

c. 220–230 · Origen, On First Principles (De Principiis), Rufinus's Latin 2.10.3

And so also to those who shall deserve to obtain an inheritance in the kingdom of heaven, that germ of the body’s restoration, which we have before mentioned, by God’s command restores out of the earthly and animal body a spiritual one, capable of inhabiting the heavens; while to each one of those who may be of inferior merit, or of more abject condition, or even the lowest in the scale, and altogether thrust aside, there is yet given, in proportion to the dignity of his life and soul, a glory and dignity of body,—nevertheless in such a way, that even the body which rises again of those who are to be destined to everlasting fire or to severe punishments, is by the very change of the resurrection so incorruptible, that it cannot be corrupted and dissolved even by severe punishments.

1692 · Thomas Watson, The Lord's Prayer 1

God will put honour upon us after death. He will put glory upon our bodies. We shall be as the angels, not for substance, but quality; our bodies shall be agile and nimble. Now they are as a weight, then they shall be as a wing, moving swiftly from place to place; they shall be full of clarity and brightness, like Christ’s glorious body. Phil 3: 21. The bodies of the saints shall be as cloth dyed into a scarlet colour, made more illustrious; they shall be so clear and transparent, that the soul shall sparkle through them, as the wine through the glass.

1856 · Charles Haddon Spurgeon, Spurgeon's Sermons, Volume 2 (1856) 66

The light of nature is sufficient to tell us that the soul is immortal, so that the infidel who doubts it is a worse fool even than a heathen, for he, before Revelation was given, had discovered it—there are some faint glimmerings in men of reason which teach that the soul is something so wonderful that it must endure forever. But the resurrection of the dead is quite another doctrine, dealing not with the soul, but with the body. The doctrine is that this actual body in which I now exist is to live with my soul; that not only is the “vital spark of heavenly flame” to burn in heaven, but the very censer in which the incense of my life doth smoke is holy unto the Lord, and is to be preserved for ever. The spirit, every one confesses, is eternal; but how many there are who deny that the bodies of men will actually start up from their graves at the great day? Many of you believe you will have a body in heaven, but you think it will be an airy fantastic body, instead of believing that it will be a body like to this—flesh and blood (although not the same kind of flesh, for all flesh is not the same flesh), a solid, substantial body, even such as we have here.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.